Friday, February 25, 2011

VASIMR - The Power Problem


In my last post, I gave a brief introduction to the VASIMR propulsion concept. For those that haven't read it yet or learned about it from somewhere else, I suggest doing so for this post to make a little more sense. In a nutshell, it's using plasma (super heated gas) controlled and guided by magnetic fields for thrust. It's super efficient and powerful. Under ideal circumstances it could take a crew to Mars in 39 days. It's a wonderful concept with incredible implications. However, it isn't without its fair share of obstacles to overcome before we see it implemented in such a mission.

The big problem is power. For VASIMR to create the thrust it has to process its fuel (including heating it to plasma state) and create the magnetic field with powerful electromagnets. These take a substantial amount of power. How much? For the hypothetical Mars mission it would energy production on the order of 1 kilowatt per 1 kilogram of mass (1kg/kW). That means there needs to be a kilowatt of power for every kilogram of mass in the reactor (probably best to assume some sort of nuclear energy in this case). To put this in perspective, under the most optimistic projections with current energy production technology, 20 kilograms per kilowatt is that best we've engineered. A reactor on that scale would need to be 4,000 tons to output the amount of energy needed to reach Mars in 39 days. They're looking at 600 tons as an ideal overall weight. That's far from the efficiency we need. We have to find a way to pump out more energy with less mass.

Luckily this is an issue scientists have devoted substantial thought and research to.  New developments are bringing our efficiency ever nearer to 1kg/kW.

Some new methods include a fresh take on fast reactors (reactors that are sustained by fast neutrons). These cut down on nuclear waste among other benefits. By trying out new materials for the reactors (new fuel and coolant) like molten salt, uranium nitride, and lead bismuth, researches are hoping to narrow the gap. Another option is a vapor core reactor which uses magnetic fields to contain a gaseous core rather than a solid core which can become unstable and melt down if temperatures reach to high. These are both very complex issues deserving of much more space and time than simple blog posts, so you should investigate yourself if they interest you.



Solar energy is also making great strides. Photovoltaic cells historically have had poor energy conversion rates, but the last few years have been full of breakthroughs to increase efficiency. The great thing about solar energy is that it is portable, so solar arrays could be on the craft itself or on a satellite orbiting Earth or Mars that beams energy to a receiving rectenna on the craft. It could even incorporate a little of both to help supplement or outright provide power.

The future may hold yet untold solutions: nuclear fusion, antimatter annihilation, or something even more alien to us. More than likely, by the time those solutions come about, VASIMR will be old news, replaced with much faster and efficient modes travel.  But to get there we must continue to explore and invest in research. With or without VASIMR our eyes should remained focused on Mars and our minds should be dreaming of ways to reach it, explore it, and colonize it. Our first steps on Mars will be just as important as our first steps on the Moon, perhaps more. Mars may one day be our home or the home of some of our descendants. It all starts here.

I have to thank Next Big Future for help in the research of this post. It's a great site and updated all the time.

Friday, February 18, 2011

VASIMR (a brief introduction)



If we're ever going to get off this planet and become a true space-faring (and colonizing) civilization, we're going to have develop some more speedy and economic means of travel. Current solid fuel rockets are incredibly heavy, bulky, and expensive for any kind of long range mission. The result is that any craft needing to get to, say, Europa will have to be very big to house all the fuel needed to get there and back in a reasonable time frame, with more fuel added simply to get the craft off the ground with all that extra weight from all that extra fuel. All that adds up to one costly launch. We don't need to settle for this though or give up on reaching the outer solar system.



Scientists from all over, in the private sector and under government dollar, are developing ways to reach the heavens faster and more efficiently. For example, a project called VASIMR (Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket) is being developed by former astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz and his team at Ad Astra. Guided by powerful electromagnets, streams of ionized and superheated (to plasma states) are thrust out creating a huge amount of force. How much force? It could theoretically take a crew from Earth to Mars in 40 days. Compare that to the 200 days it would take a conventional rocket to reach Mars and you begin to see the potential.

There are many hurdles to overcome before this project becomes a reality (which I will discuss in a later entry), but it's one of the brightest potential solutions for long-range space travel.

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

The Cosmos Series - In Full

So I've posted a couple of videos with him narrating made a couple of brief mentions of his name, but perhaps I haven't quite elucidated why I hold him in such high esteem, and for those who aren't familiar with him or haven't read his work, it might remain quite a mystery. So I scoured youtube, and found the complete set of Carl Sagan's Cosmos television series. Thirteen episodes of science, presented in a form the public can enjoy and understand without diluting the information too much. Sagan was a gifted link between populace and academia. I urge everyone to watch the series and read his books as well. Here they are, in HD even, all thirteen episodes of Carl Sagan's Cosmos.

Episode One: The Shores of the Cosmic Ocean



Episode Two: One Voice in the Cosmic Fugue



Episode Three: Harmony of the Worlds



Episode Four: Heaven and Hell



Episode Five: Blues for a Red Planet



Episode Six: Travelers' Tales



Episode Seven: The Backbone of Night



Episode Eight: Travels in Space and Time



Episode Nine: The Lives of the Stars



Episode Ten: The Edge of Forever



Episode Eleven: The Persistence of Memory



Episode Twelve: Encyclopedia Galactica



Episode Thirteen: Who Speaks for Earth?

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Ponder-fuel

"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.' " - Isaac Asimov

Monday, February 7, 2011

Outrageous! - Creationism in up to 60% of US Biology Classrooms



Read full article here.

For those who want the short version of the article, I do a little synthesis. Basically, a national survey of over 900 public school biology teachers revealed that, contrary to the recommendations of the National Research Council, only 28% of the surveyed teachers taught evolution as the most founded and best theory of what drives biology. Some other 60% took a soft stance, giving both evolution and creationism class time (in various proportions). That would be troubling enough on its own, but the next part is sure to make the blood of anyone dedicated to scientific honesty boil. The remaining 12-13% explicitly advocate creationism and devote significant class time to its teaching. It demonstrates such a lack of respect for the science from those charged with educating our youth, that the hiring process for teachers and the education system in general deserves to be looked over with a very scrutinous eye. It's absolutely unacceptable that tax dollars fund the teaching of a religious concept that has no scientific merit.

Dr. Randy Moore of the University of Minnesota summed it up well, saying, “with 15 to 20 percent of biology teachers teaching creationism, this is the biggest failure in science education. There’s no other field where teachers reject the foundations of their science like they do in biology.”

Friday, February 4, 2011

Inspiration

As I said last post, this post would be dedicated to posting a few videos that are inspiring to me. These videos sum up very well how I feel about life very well and make tangible the intangible and often mysterious longing that resides in every one of us. These are videos that inspire hope for the future and also serve as calls to action to make our promise as a species reality. You'll notice a common name among a lot of ideas these videos espouse, Carl Sagan.  He was a man of startling insight and a rare gift to make complex and seemingly abstract concepts knowable. He encouraged us to always be curious and always be skeptical so that we may ask the important questions and discover valid answers. I picked these specific videos, because they cut to the essence of scientific discovery without scaring off the mainstream with technical talk. In short, they inspire us to search out the answers by only giving a taste of the beauty that can be found. They serve to get us excited about learning, giving practical weight to an understanding of the world around us. They also serve to put our lives in perspective. Without further gab on my part, here are the videos:

A synthesis of readings from Sagan's Pale Blue Dot set to an imaginary ad for NASA.


Richard Dawkins speaking on the incredible blessing it is to be alive and aware, here and now.


Another Sagan, probably his most famous in modern times. Perspective distilled in 5 minutes.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

What this whole thing is about

It is something, I think, that the things that perhaps choke me up the most... that can compel to me to cry and fight back the urge to outright weep are the things that many find cold and alienating. Science. More specifically scientific progression. Progression measured by science and made by science. Most of the activity on Earth keeps noses to the ground and perspectives small. The cosmos is unfathomable and the method of discovery magic. Images of distant galaxies, worlds, and stars, the light that fills the night sky, seems only to be an image. It is hardly distinguishable from the McDonald's logo. It is easy to slip into a myopic view of existence when so many lights and colors compete for our attention. The reason I started this concept of Cosmolism is to try to offer an alternative where science is not alienating but rather participatory. Through knowledge, anyone has the ability to see problems in society and the power to fix them. As a population with a thirst for answers, we have the ability to see the stars and the power to reach for them. It is not just a cloud of numbers and abstract ideas, but revelations about who we are, where we come from, and where we can go.

Videos like the one I'm about to post are the kinds of videos that, even though goofy elements may prevail throughout, smack me to the ground in awe.



Next post will be a special edition of videos that inspire me.